June 24, 2017

Freeholder’s barrister Justin Bates named in Parliament. And Benjamin Mire. And Tchenguiz. And Yianis. And Israel Moskovitz …

Please follow and like us:

… Labour MP Jim Fitzpatrick and Sir Peter Bottomley put the boot in to leasehold profiteers!

Residents at Canary Riverside have been “ripped off and exploited” by freeholder the Yianis Group, owned by John Christodoulou, according to Jim Fitzpatrick in Parliament yesterday

Residents in London’s Docklands have been “ripped off and exploited”, according to Jim Fitzpatrick yesterday. He referred to Canary Riverside by name, which is owned and managed by the Yianis Group 

Jim Fitzpatrick raised the issue of leasehold abuses in Parliament yesterday

Jim Fitzpatrick has London’s richest and poorest leaseholders in his Docklands constituency

Two senior MPs from opposite political parties yesterday delivered hard-hitting speeches in Parliament that highlighted the scandals in leasehold.

And in a sign of the rising political temperature concerning these issues, neither hesitated to name names.

Jim Fitzpatrick, the MP for Limehouse and Poplar which has some of the poorest and richest leaseholders in the country, named the Yianis Group (which is owned by Cyprus-born and Monaco-based millionaire John Christodoulou, who was not personally named), and its management company Octagon Assets, as well as Tchenguiz and Peverel, who he described as “predators”.

Both have been named in the Commons before.

Sir Peter Bottomley waded in to call on freeholders’ barrister Justin Bates “to say out loud the ways in which opportunist managing agents and freeholders can frustrate an application [for right to manage] to the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal or the first stage of the Property Chamber”.

He went on to name chartered surveyor and disgraced managing agent Benjamin Mire, who would have been sacked from his judicial appointment to the property tribunal had he not resigned last July.

“I name Mr Benjamin Mire who, when shown a report by the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, resigned his position. If he had not, the report would have been made public.

“Because he resigned after reading the report, we do not know what is in it—actually, we do know what is in the report because we know what he had been doing, but we do not have that information formally.”

Sir Peter said “the professional standards bodies for surveyors, bankers, barristers and others should review the actions of some of their members”. He added:

“If someone does something illegal, that is clearly wrong. But someone doing something that is against the public interest should not happen in a profession.”

He declared: “Something needs to happen to make things fair, to give people freedom and to avoid what I have called criminal behaviour in leasehold deals, price-fixing cartels, the cheating of freeholders and excessive exit fees and fiddles.

“Opportunist lawyers are playing the system, and at times the Property Chamber — or the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, as it was — has not been led with the determination that secures justice …”

Both MPs praised the activities of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, and Martin Boyd and Sebastian O’Kelly were also named.

The adjournment debate – in Westminster Hall, not the Commons itself – was instigated by Fitzpatrick in frustration at the “growing issue” of leasehold cheating he is seeing in London’s Docklands.

“Professional and qualified individuals, residents who paid large sums of money for the homes that they inhabit … are being ripped off and exploited by unscrupulous property management companies and individuals who have spawned these management companies.”

West India Quay in London’s Docklands is another site where freeholder the Yianis Group is cheating residents, according to Fitzpatrick

West India Quay in London’s Docklands is another site where freeholder is the Yianis Group, which also manages the site

He referred to two high profile cases in his constituency concerning Canary Riverside and West India Quay. “Both involve companies owned by the Yianis Group and are operated by Octagon Assets.”

Fitzpatrick criticised the complexity of the right to manage process, which saw residents at Kingsmere in Brighton (who employed lawyer Yashmin Mistry) losing £30,000, and cited the cases of Dennis Jackson, in Battersea, whose dispute over £7,000 escalated to £76,000 in legal fees and nearly the loss through forfeiture of his £800,000 property.

“We have had predators such as the Tchenguiz brothers and Peverel, the largest property management company in England, with many complaints from pensioners and others about onerous and unnecessary maintenance work and about exacting fees.”

Fitzpatrick used to live on an estate “that was previously managed by Peverel, which was previously owned by the Tchenguiz brothers, who were quite notorious”.

He welcomed the Office of Fair Trading investigation into leasehold property management announced two day’s ago, and eagerly anticipates the result of the OFT report into the Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal to be announced tomorrow.

The MP recognized that Labour had not nailed leasehold abuse when it was in power.

“When we were in government, I know that we tried to address the issue to a certain extent. We had a number of stabs at it, but sadly we did not cover it. I am very hopeful that the Minister will be able to say that the coalition are still very interested in the subject and want to address it.”

AndrewSmithMPAndrew Smith, Labour MP for Oxford East (right), said “these problems are a particular nightmare for elderly residents who simply cannot cope with the pressure that they are put under and the extent of the rise in costs”.

Fitzpatrick paid warm tribute to the work of LKP and Carlex in this sector.

“I congratulate the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership both in respect of the full OFT investigation into residential leasehold and the securing of the OFT report into the Peverel-Cirrus price-fixing racket.”

Sir Peter Bottomley urged the government to heed the OFT inquiry into the Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal

“…and consider what the Serious Fraud Office had, and the OFT has, on Peverel, which has been named. I would also like the Minister to consider Mr Israel Moskovitz, who, again, has played the system to avoid his leaseholders in Plymouth getting into dispute resolution, the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, or the right to manage or the right to purchase.”

 

Sir Peter Bottomley is not hesitating to name those playing the system in leasehold

Sir Peter Bottomley is not hesitating to name those playing the system in leasehold

While Sir Peter declared that “LKP has saved millions of pounds for hundreds of people”, he gave mild praise to LEASE.

“The government’s Leasehold Advisory Service does its best, but it does not have enough money or resources, and sadly it has to take advertisements from people who should not be advertising at all, let alone through a Government advisory service.”

This is in reference to LEASE continuing to promote Benjamin Mire’s Trust Property Management on its website.

Regarding ARMA, the Association of Residential Managing Agents, “with our former colleague Keith Hill as its arbitrator”, Sir Peter said that it is taking “some of the right ways forward”.

But:

“It ought to be illegal for any managing agent or freeholder to take a commission from an insurance company without having an open book, and without showing that what they are doing is in the best interest of leaseholders.

“… Bluntly, it is wrong that were I a convicted fraudster who came out of jail yesterday, I could set up as a managing agent today without having to meet necessary and obvious standards.

“Such standards are not just for those who live in big flats on the Thames—those with lawyers and expensive flats—but for small people who cannot get anything other than a leasehold property of their own in which to live, hopefully without undue cost.”

Like Fitzpatrick, Sir Peter eagerly anticipated the OFT report into the Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal to be announced, but not necessarily published, tomorrow.

He also criticised the OFT granting Peverel leniency by accepting the fiction that it somehow turned itself in.

“If I were 99 per cent of the market, I do not think I should get relief from the OFT rules by confessing my sins after the Serious Fraud Office had passed my case to the OFT.”

The full debate can be read here

Comments

  1. If you are pinning your hopes on Mr Fitzpatrick, don’t. Over 200 flats in a block looked to him for help and were left sorely dissappointed- he was there for the pleastantries and profile and fobbed the follow through to an office person.

  2. Mr AM is pouring cold water over prospects of reform or improvement in comments on both the Carlex / LKP websites, for reasons of his own. He has been asked to explain his background by another commentor, given the supposedly knowledgeable pontificating.

    Obtaining this debate and naming names is very useful to us as events will prove. Tomorrow’s announcement by the OFT of the Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal, for example.

    MPs have not been effectively deployed in the past. The issues of leasehold are complex; time is limited. Presented with precise issues where their weight can help, they are extremely effective at resolving disputes. This site and LKP have recent examples.

    Sebastian

  3. After waiting over 4 years since Peverel Group handed themselves in for Price Fixing/Bid Rigging we have a date tomorrow for the OFT conclude their investigation, but what will we know???

    As they likely to be granted “leniency from court action what happens to the £500,000.00 that it has already cost us taxpayers?

    We are likely to have been ripped off again so it will have cost us the leaseholders, the original amounts that we had paid out.

    We now may find that the OFT has also ripped us off??

  4. The Professional Standards Bodies, such as:-
    Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) have been shown that they have failed to take action on some of their own members and condoned the poor workings of the Leasehold Valuation Tribunals (LVT)

    There should be a Public Enquiry into the results of the LVTs were leaseholders have lost and charges paid out of Service Charges?

    Then there is the Association of Residential Managing Agents (ARMA) say no more?

    Office of Fair Trading (OFT) I hope I have to apologise to them tomorrow?